BMW S1000RR Forum banner

2015 Exhaust Servo Disconnceted!

1 reading
51K views 72 replies 31 participants last post by  loki4606  
#1 ·
If you disconnect the servo just before the mid pipe you will get a much deeper tone out of the exhaust at slow speed to idle. It will be louder by a noticeable amount. The stock exhaust sounds great until to hear the servo valve full open while at idle. The servo really wakes up the at idle sound. You can feel the exhaust on your chest more. Its just an easy mod that will hold you over until a few pipes come out. The video was from a phone so its hard to hear but if you want more sound even after the baffle then the servo is next and last for the stock exhaust.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-cL1sBxyPA&feature=youtu.be


How to!

1. remove metal clip from plastic cover. I used a flat head screw driver and pushed the clip to the front of the bike.

2. pull plastic cover off. Its a very brittle part so be easy. I broke an ear off of it. Im lucky in that you cant see where i broke it. It should pull off easy.

3. Use a wrench to loosen the nuts on the top side of the cable housing tubes. Dont move the lower nuts just the upper ones.

4. Pull the cable housing tubes off the bracket and remove the cable from the servo wheel.

5. Replace the cable housing tubes back on the bracket and tighten the top nuts back down.

6. Replace the palstic cover and metal clip.

DONE- Its that easy. I did it before work today. Took more time to make this video then the mod took.
 
#2 ·
I had done this in the past on my 2 BMWs. But i think there is a a good reason for this valve/servo other than limiting the exhaust sound at low RPM and Idle. At Under 5K RPM the valve creates more back pressure which benefits the low-midrange power/torque.
 
#4 ·
Yes it sounds much better with the servo disconnected.



I will try it out today and see if the mid range feels any softer. I really dont think i will notice tho. The bike has more power then what i am used to so it will be hard for me feel the loss if any.

Im more happy with the sound over 1 or 2 hp anyway.
 
#8 · (Edited)
Has anyone REMOVED the cables on the 2015 yet? BMW moved the servo motor into a completely freakin impossible to reach spot. I'm in the process of installing a full system and need these cables gone but cannot for the life of me figure out how to get to the servo motor. Short of removing the swingarm-which I have no desire to do-I'm stumped.
 
#12 ·
Finally got the little bastard. The plastic housing for the servo slides down onto a thin bracket, which isn't visible to the eye. Easiest way I found was to unbolt the lower two subframe bolts, pivot the subframe up and out of the way, and then you'll be able to slide the servo off of its bracket, open it up and remove the cables.

Was actually fairly easy once I figured out just how the servo was mounted.
 
#15 ·
Yup, further....anytime you eliminate the factory Cat, you eliminate the servo and hence the cables are useless. At least that's been the case on every bike I've had where I installed a link pipe and ditched the Cat
 
#16 ·
Don't believe rear servo aids in back pressure, previously it was determined that the front was for management and the rear was for noise compliance....

I did this last night, but left cables on bike this time around, my advice would be to take care in positioning the loose cables because they still move, so don't constrict them when putting cover back on.
 
#24 ·
I did this last night, but left cables on bike this time around, my advice would be to take care in positioning the loose cables because they still move, so don't constrict them when putting cover back on.
Yup, second this. Hence why I decided it worth it to just go through the effort of removing them. It wasn't fun but I could do it again in a matter of minutes now that I have it figured out how to get to the servos.
 
#18 · (Edited)
But this is not an issue with MotoGP and WSBK bikes. So why would they have servos?

An additional point:

SAE J1287 specifies that dB level is measured 20" from the exhaust outlet at 45 degrees, engine RPM at 50% of "the engine speed in revolutions per minute at which the engine delivers its maximum Net Brake Power as defined in SAE J1349."

Assuming maximum horsepower is achieved at 13,000 RPM, test RPM is 6,5000 - well above when the servo exhaust valve is opened.

Thus, the servo is not there to meet noise regulations.
 
#19 ·
What does an exhaust servo motor do?
exup systemAn exhaust servo motor is one component of the exhaust valve system (sometimes called the ex-up or power valve system) found on almost every modern sportbike including all Honda, Kawasaki, Yamaha, Suzuki, BMW, Ducati, Triumph and a few others. The system consist of a few parts, the first is the valve assembly inside the exhaust pipe. This is a simple butterfly valve that can open or close to change the amount of exhaust flow. Connected to this valve is a set of cables that run to the other part of the system, the servo motor. This motor, which is controlled by the engine control unit, has a pulley on top that rotates the cables to open and close the valve in the exhaust. The cables are used to isolate the motor from the hot exhaust and allow it to be placed in a more convenient place on the bike.

The purpose of this system according to the motorcycle manufacturers’ marketing departments is to create back-pressure at lower RPM’s to increase torque. Unfortunately, this probably isn’t the real reason; the true purpose of the exup valves is to meet noise and emissions regulations. The exhaust valves are partially closed at idle and low rpm to reduce noise, and closed again at the upper RPMs to meet peak noise and emissions regulations. The proof of this has been shown on the dyno where removing the valves and retuning the engine creates a flatter better torque curve. Additionally, in the USA, most bikes close the valve again at the upper RPM range, but in Europe they do not (different regulations) and the European bikes typically create a few more HP on the top end as a result.


Exhaust valves and servo motors explained
 
#20 ·
As for moto gp and other race classes and why do they have them! I would say that their bikes are so far ahead of ours does it matter???? If i had to actually pick a reason i would say its mostly due to noise as well. i know on many tracks they have a noise level (DB MAX) im not sure if the rules bend for top level racing classes or not. My second opinion would be to gain every single tiny little bit of torque they can. Maybe in a certain corner they can lug the engine more to get more drive out of the corner. Or open it up and get a higher top speed in a long corner.
 
#21 ·
I appreciate the speculation, here and elsewhere, that it is to meet noise regulations - but the testing is done at an RPM where the valve is open. Thus, keeping the noise down to meet the reg cannot be the reason.

After market exhausts delete the valves to reduce complexity and weight, and because the primary reason we buy them is for the sound.

MotoGP bikes scream at low RPMs and scream louder at high RPM. :) While there are noise regulations at various tracks (I do not know if there are any where MotoGP is run), an exhaust valve would need be set to close at the location where sound is measured - not at a given RPM.

And, as you indicate, MotoGP bikes are special critters and the valve use there may well be used to extract the last bit of power. As may well be the case for our bikes.

It is an amusing topic, always rife with speculation and competing links that support multiple theories.

My guess is the closed valve assists low RPM throttle response and tractability, more than with peak torque at these RPMs.
 
#22 · (Edited)
#31 ·
^ lol...kind of figured it was more to it than just two bolts once I started messing with it. that's why I asked about tank. at that angle, tank would have to be off.

I don't feel like dealing with the hoses (particularly accidentally damaging the quick disconnect on fuel line), but I'm going to have my tank painted anyway so I will do it then or try to disconnect them without lifting subframe. Looking at your pic, it may be possible....Thanks.
 
#33 ·
Kinda forgot about this thread. Oops.

Disconnecting them without lifting the subframe is possible, but getting the now disconnected cables actually popped loose from the servo housing is another story, because of the way they slide out. The hoses and fuel line all came off super easy, I wouldn't worry about damaging them.

Picture does make it look like a huge job but it's not bad. More time consuming than anything.