By most accounts the S1000rr is at least 40 hp short of matching the current motogp bikes, but it is the baddest stock bike on the street...how much of a difference are we talking about between our BMWs and the bikes ridden by Valentino Rossi and Jorge Lorenzo?
Obviously there is a substantial difference considering the amount of money riding on the performance of MotoGP bikes under racing conditions, but BMW did a phenomenal job of engineering our machines as well, and I like to think that they are the closest thing (stock) to a race bike.
There is no comparison. Well they both have engines, 2 wheels, and a frame. Similarities end there.
V4 18,0000 RPM motors - (except the Yamaha M1, inline 4)
To give you an example of the transmissions. The transmission in a factory Honda RCV cost $750,000.
Pnuematic valves!
Electronics electronics electronics
Carbon brakes
These bikes are prototypes for a reason. Like nothing you can imagine.
There is no comparison. Well they both have engines, 2 wheels, and a frame. Similarities end there.
V4 18,0000 RPM motors - (except the Yamaha M1, inline 4)
To give you an example of the transmissions. The transmission in a factory Honda RCV cost $750,000.
Pnuematic valves!
Electronics electronics electronics
Carbon brakes
These bikes are prototypes for a reason. Like nothing you can imagine.
What is so special about the trans to cost $750k ?
There is no comparison. Well they both have engines, 2 wheels, and a frame. Similarities end there.
V4 18,0000 RPM motors - (except the Yamaha M1, inline 4)
To give you an example of the transmissions. The transmission in a factory Honda RCV cost $750,000.
Pnuematic valves!
Electronics electronics electronics
Carbon brakes
These bikes are prototypes for a reason. Like nothing you can imagine.
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing-could you elaborate a bit on the $750,000 transmission?