» Site Navigation |
|
» » » Motorcycle Forums
|

» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
04-30-2011, 07:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 755
|
Custom Map vs. Autotune
This Tuesday, I am dynoing my bike to see where I am at with mods. A custom tune at the shop is $250. If you have the Autotune, would it do just the same as a custom map over time, or should I get a custom map and let the Autotune keep doing its thing?
Running PCV + Autotune.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-01-2011, 01:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 13
|
Well, the autotune will give you the best "custom map" for your bike and mods. Is the perfect tool. BTW, you need to accept the changes to your existing map for the autotune corrections to take effect.
The other consideration is to what AFR you are targeting the autotune. You may search the best output power AFR on the dyno, and then use the autotune in real world riding, along the entire throttle range and rpms, to set a map for that target.
__________________
Pablo
05 ZX-10R
|
|
|
05-02-2011, 07:40 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 755
|
Well tomorrow I am doing the dyno. I will get an opinion from the technician. Thanks Sextaafondo for your input. I will probably just dyno to see where the bike is and then think about a custom map if I get poor results. I will post results in a new thread tomorrow evening.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 03:29 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 310
|
If you have the auto tune you shouldnt need the dyno tune..
Would be cool to see if they are close though..
__________________
tom@biohazardcycles.com
Email me with any questions or deals...
ARROW, LEOVINCE, AKRAPOVIC, TAYLORMADE, TERMI, M4, BROCKS, MUZZY, JARDINE, YOSHIMURA, TWO BROS, ALPINESTARS, SCOPRIO ALARMS
www.biohazardcycles.com
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 03:52 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIOHAZARDCYCLES
If you have the auto tune you shouldnt need the dyno tune..
Would be cool to see if they are close though..
|
I did do the dyno today and the technician made some corrections to the PCV and Autotune which bumped HP 8.87 at rear wheel. The bike is still fairly new, so I am going to ride for a couple of 1000 miles and he is going to check where we are at on the dyno again. I will post the dyno chart when I get home later today.  Definitely could feel the difference response wise!
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 04:10 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
R.I.P., you will be missed but never forgotten...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8M3
I did do the dyno today and the technician made some corrections to the PCV and Autotune which bumped HP 8.87 at rear wheel. The bike is still fairly new, so I am going to ride for a couple of 1000 miles and he is going to check where we are at on the dyno again. I will post the dyno chart when I get home later today.  Definitely could feel the difference response wise!
|
The problem with that is that you do not know what af the tuner eventually set in. Your AT will go back to the original target. You need to understand the af created on the dyno and set that as a target.
N.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 04:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel
The problem with that is that you do not know what af the tuner eventually set in. Your AT will go back to the original target. You need to understand the af created on the dyno and set that as a target.
N.
|
He changed ratio from between 13.2 and 13.8. He settled in at 13.6 for best numbers. I will post the dyno chart when I get home. He explained to me what he was doing, but he felt that the Autotune would do its own thing as well especially in the low end.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 05:30 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
R.I.P., you will be missed but never forgotten...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8M3
He changed ratio from between 13.2 and 13.8. He settled in at 13.6 for best numbers. I will post the dyno chart when I get home. He explained to me what he was doing, but he felt that the Autotune would do its own thing as well especially in the low end.
|
Yes, understood. But was the map he did on the PC equivilant to the 13.X he set as a target? I doubt it. When I say the AT will go back to the original target, I mean to the one set as the target (old or chaged value) and not to the map values where it made max hp on the dyno. I would prefer to regularly check HP from different targets with maps being adjusted by the AT. That way when it makes good powr your map is set for the target AF. I know everyone can't do this but I don't see how else.
N.
Last edited by Nigel; 05-03-2011 at 05:35 PM.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 05:49 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 414
|
So if I understand this correctly, I can pay $200.00 for the auto tune that will give me just about the same map as a $250.00 technician dyno tune.
__________________
The more I practice the luckier I get. - Gary Player.
|
|
|
05-03-2011, 06:15 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 13
|
The only drawback is the autotune is highly susceptible to get fouled by exhaust leaks (fresh air entering) and will tend to enrich the AFR. The secondary air injection to the exhaust has to be blocked off as well.
Also the engine will partially suck fresh air from the pipe outlet at low revs fouling the lambda sensor reading and thus the AT adjustments, so it's not good at low revs.
__________________
Pablo
05 ZX-10R
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|